

We may not drop badly, but I do expect us to go down playing a deeper rotation with younger guys.īlocks, I expect, will go up, and that is a very good thing. Patterson, Stevenson, Meeks and Porter are all reliable free-throwers, but the newcomer's skill is yet to be determined. Bradley and Crawford were both very reliable from the line, and we lose them.
#Uk basketball roster 2007 free#
Of course, you have to treat all this with a grain of salt - kind of like the whole "summer basketball" reports we always get that so often turn out to be hyperbole.įield goal percentage from 2 ought to be about the same, or maybe even better due to the addition of bigger people and a strong motivation to go inside to Patterson, Stevenson and Harrellson.Īnother thing that may decline somewhat from last year is free throw shooting. I have heard that Galloway isn't a reliable 3-point shooter, but that Ramon Harris has greatly improved his range. Word is that Liggins is more competent from the perimeter than first thought, and Meeks and Porter should both be able to shoot respectable percentages. That figures to suffer a bit this year, but maybe not as much as some originally thought.

Kentucky was a pretty decent 3-point shooting team last year with Crawford and Bradley making the shots. With Bradley and Crawford gone, I expect this stat to suffer some. Overall, FG shooting should be pretty good You have to worry about a big drop in 3-point FG shooting. This should improve even more with the additional size UK has coming in. , an awesome stats website, is my source for these numbers. In order to do that, we are going to start by taking a look at the good versus the bad from last year from a statistical perspective.

Basketball is officially kicked off now everywhere in the nation, and it's time for us at A Sea of Blue to begin looking at the 2008-09 season in earnest.
